Takao Indoh wrote:
> Hi Bob, Dave,
>
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:08:08 -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
>
> >Bob Montgomery wrote:
> >
> >> I've been experimenting with the makedumpfile utility for kdump on ia64.
> >> One of my experiments was to verify that a page that should have been
> >> missing indeed was missing. I used crash 4.0-3.8 to look for a user
> >> page that should have been omitted from the dump.
> >>
> >> crash> x/xg 0xe0000040fc00c000
> >> 0xe0000040fc00c000: 0x0000000000000000
> >>
> >> On a full dump from makedumpfile as well as on a straight copy of
> >> vmcore, crash reports this:
> >>
> >> crash> x/xg 0xe0000040fc00c000
> >> 0xe0000040fc00c000: 0x00010102464c457f
> >>
> >> The dumpfiles created by makedumpfile appear to crash as diskdump files,
> >> and crash appears to excuse missing pages and report 0x0 contents here:
> >>
> >> diskdump.c:read_diskdump, line 454:
> >>
> >> if (!page_is_dumpable(pfn)) {
> >> memset(bufptr, 0, cnt);
> >> return cnt;
> >>
> >> Shouldn't there be some indication that a requested page is missing as
> >> opposed to being legitimately full of zeros?
> >>
> >> Bob Montgomery
> >
> >Hi Bob,
> >
> >That decision was made by the diskdump developers
> >when I accepted their diskdump-specific work into the
> >crash utility.
> >
> >As I recall, I kind of agreed with you at the time, but there
> >was some compelling reason that they had that argued for
> >passing a zero-filled page -- although I don't recall what it
> >was?
> >
> >I don't believe it had anything to do with user pages,
> >but in the case of some of the other kernel pages that can
> >be left out of the dump, passing back a zero-filled page
> >was a cleaner way to handle whatever the problem was.
> >
> >Anyway, I've long since forgotten why they wanted it
> >that way...
> >
> >Perhaps the diskdump guys on this list can refresh my
> >memory?
>
> My memory is also unclear...
> As far as my dim memory goes, I decided the following policy when I
> wrote this code.
>
> 1) If the page is not found because of invalid address(e.g. address
> points memory hole), read_diskdump should return error.
> 2) If the page is not found because of partial dump, read_diskdump
> should return zero-filled page.
>
> Perhaps I decided the 2nd policy because of simplicity of implementation.
> Bob points out that crash should do something instead of passing
> zero-filled page (e.g. showing message) in the 2nd case, right?
>
If I recall, displaying an error message at the point of the
zero-filled page return could happen in an inopportune
time, messing up the output of something? In other words,
the code that read the zero-filled page was expecting
some type of known data, and when it received a zero,
it quietly and gracefully continued. I think...
What you could do is set up makedumpfile to restrict
pages to its maximum capability, and instead of returning
a zero-filled page in read_diskdump(), insert an
"error(FATAL,...)" call there. It would be interesting
to note whether (1) the system comes up, and (2) whether
it effects commands that otherwise would work.
Dave
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
