Olaf Hering wrote: > This one may be harmless, but our build output checks dont like it. > Hi Olaf, Although ppc64 builds here OK without it, out of paranoia I made sure that it builds with it as well -- queued for next release. Thanks, Dave > > --- > gdb-6.1.patch | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Index: crash-4.0-2.33/gdb-6.1.patch > =================================================================== > --- crash-4.0-2.33.orig/gdb-6.1.patch > +++ crash-4.0-2.33/gdb-6.1.patch > @@ -1,4 +1,15 @@ > ---- gdb-6.1/bfd/coff-alpha.c.orig > +debug.c: In function 'trace_usage': > +debug.c:129: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'strlen' > + > + > +--- > + bfd/coff-alpha.c | 2 +- > + sim/ppc/debug.c | 1 + > + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > + > +Index: gdb-6.1/bfd/coff-alpha.c > +=================================================================== > +--- gdb-6.1.orig/bfd/coff-alpha.c > +++ gdb-6.1/bfd/coff-alpha.c > @@ -1455,7 +1455,7 @@ alpha_relocate_section (output_bfd, info > amt = sizeof (struct ecoff_section_tdata); > @@ -9,3 +20,15 @@ > } > > if (lita_sec_data->gp != 0) > +Index: gdb-6.1/sim/ppc/debug.c > +=================================================================== > +--- gdb-6.1.orig/sim/ppc/debug.c > ++++ gdb-6.1/sim/ppc/debug.c > +@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > + #ifdef HAVE_STDLIB_H > + #include <stdlib.h> > + #endif > ++#include <string.h> > + > + int ppc_trace[nr_trace_options]; > + > > -- > Crash-utility mailing list > Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
