hi Dave, is there any good reason not to include Xen header files into crash code? (for ex, i see that you have copied few Xen structures from xenctrl.h) other thing: would it be better if you put the Changelog file into the source tree? btw, we would love to see the "TODO" list, if you have any. those who are interested will know what is in the priority list, and might help out. what do you think? thanks. Q On 3/24/06, Dave Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > - Incorporated initial patch-set to implement support for kernels built > with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM. (dwilder@xxxxxxxxxx) > > - Fix for post-2.6.15 ppc64 kernels to use cpu_online_map when perusing > the paca array for the per_cpu_offsets. (haren@xxxxxxxxxx) > > - Fix for ppc64 "bt" command for active tasks that were running in > user space at the time of crash. (haren@xxxxxxxxxx) > > - Fix to remove dependencies upon any kernel header files so as to > allow crash to build in a Ubuntu environment. (aquynh@xxxxxxxxx) > > - Fix size of x86_64 "cpu_khz" variable to match that of the kernel. > (sharyath@xxxxxxxxxx) > > - Created framework for support of Xen kernel dumpfiles and live Xen > kernels; this is going to be a long-period work-in-progress affair, > and the code added in this release is being done now primarily to aid > in future patch integration efforts. (anderson@xxxxxxxxxx) > > Download from: http://people.redhat.com/anderson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Crash-utility mailing list > Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility > > > -- regards, Quynh
