Badari Pulavarty wrote: > On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 13:23 -0400, Dave Anderson wrote: > > > > This message was bounced due to its size of its attachment; > > I've since bumped up the maximum allowable message size: > > > > > > Re: [Crash-utility] crash 4.0-2.8 fails on 2.6.14-rc5 > > (EM64T) > > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:15:47 -0700 > > From: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: <crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx> > > References: 1, 2, 3, 4 > > > > I already sent you the changed routines (since it didn't let me > send the whole file). I haven't touched any other routines, if > you want to the whole file - I can send it again. > Right -- but like I said in the last message (did you see my comments within it?) your changes are exactly what I suggested, and I don't see why they would cause a problem. But check out my last post for why I think it may have something to do with the per-cpu data structure handling in the x86_64 kernel. Dave > > Thanks, > Badari > > -- > Crash-utility mailing list > Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
