On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 07:58:33AM +1000, James Calligeros wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 2:23 AM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 10:07:42PM +1000, James Calligeros wrote: > > > IRQ handling was added in commit dae191fb957f ("ASoC: tas2764: Add IRQ > > > handling") however that same commit masks all interrupts coming from > > > the chip. Unmask the "main" interrupts so that we can see and > > > deal with a number of errors including clock, voltage, and current. > > Shouldn't this also be a fix? > I don't think so. The referenced commit only says that it adds an IRQ handler. > I don't think this commit is actually "fixing" anything - it's just > enabling previously > masked interrupts. I think the expectation would be that when the interrupt handler was added it would've been possible for it to fire.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [PATCH v3 00/20] ASoC: tas27{64,70}: improve support for Apple codec variants
- From: James Calligeros
- [PATCH v3 15/20] ASoC: tas2764: Enable main IRQs
- From: James Calligeros
- Re: [PATCH v3 15/20] ASoC: tas2764: Enable main IRQs
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH v3 15/20] ASoC: tas2764: Enable main IRQs
- From: James Calligeros
- [PATCH v3 00/20] ASoC: tas27{64,70}: improve support for Apple codec variants
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt6359: Fix DT parse error due to wrong child node name
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for S4 audio
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 15/20] ASoC: tas2764: Enable main IRQs
- Next by thread: [PATCH v3 16/20] ASoC: tas2770: Power cycle amp on ISENSE/VSENSE change
- Index(es):
![]() |