On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 06:35:51PM +1000, James Calligeros wrote: > From: Martin Povišer <povik+lin@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa <neal@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Martin Povišer <povik+lin@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: James Calligeros <jcalligeros99@xxxxxxxxx> Again, why do this? Is this a bug fix of some kind (ie, does the hardware misbehave if we get this wrong) or is it just for neatness?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 17/29] ASoC: tas2764: Crop SDOUT zero-out mask based on BCLK ratio
- From: Martin Povišer
- Re: [PATCH v2 17/29] ASoC: tas2764: Crop SDOUT zero-out mask based on BCLK ratio
- References:
- [PATCH v2 00/29] ASoC: tas27{64,70}: improve support for Apple codec variants
- From: James Calligeros
- [PATCH v2 17/29] ASoC: tas2764: Crop SDOUT zero-out mask based on BCLK ratio
- From: James Calligeros
- [PATCH v2 00/29] ASoC: tas27{64,70}: improve support for Apple codec variants
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 14/29] ASoC: tas2770: expose die temp to hwmon
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 18/29] ASoC: tas2764: Enable main IRQs
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 17/29] ASoC: tas2764: Crop SDOUT zero-out mask based on BCLK ratio
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 17/29] ASoC: tas2764: Crop SDOUT zero-out mask based on BCLK ratio
- Index(es):
 |