Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/15] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep

[Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 16:55:04 +0100
> Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 3:23 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 15:37:48 +0100
> > > Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 3:35 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 12:21 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:33:26 -0600, David Lechner wrote:
> > > > > > > This series was inspired by some minor annoyance I have experienced a
> > > > > > > few times in recent reviews.
> > > > >
> > > > > ...
> > > > >
> > > > > > [07/15] iio: adc: ad7606: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
> > > > > >         commit: 8203bc81f025a3fb084357a3d8a6eb3053bc613a
> > > > > > [08/15] iio: amplifiers: hmc425a: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
> > > > > >         commit: e18d359b0a132eb6619836d1bf701f5b3b53299b
> > > > > > [09/15] iio: resolver: ad2s1210: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
> > > > > >         commit: 7920df29f0dd3aae3acd8a7115d5a25414eed68f
> > > > > > [10/15] iio: resolver: ad2s1210: use bitmap_write
> > > > > >         commit: a67e45055ea90048372066811da7c7fe2d91f9aa
> > > > >
> > > > > FWIW, Jonathan usually takes care of patch queue on weekends.
> > > > > But whatever, it's not my business after all :-)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Too many conflicting suggestions. I just picked up all Acked patches. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> > >
> > > Resolution of any issues 'should' be easy enough. Let's keep an eye on how
> > > it goes as other series hit Linux next.  Might be a little work to be done there
> > > and by Linus in next merge window.
> > >
> > > Jonathan
> > >
> >
> > I'm totally fine with removing the iio commits from my queue if you
> > prefer to take them.
> >
> Hi Bartosz,
>
> That's probably going to prove slightly less painful, so please do.
> I'll merge in that immutable tag and pick them up once you've dropped them.
>

Done, you can push your branch out and the next "next" should be ok now.

Bart