Re: [PATCH 1/9] ASoC: SOF: imx: introduce more common structures and functions

[Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 06:59:53PM +0200, Laurentiu Mihalcea wrote:
> On 2/3/2025 9:52 PM, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 12:18:00PM -0500, Laurentiu Mihalcea wrote:

> >> +static void imx_handle_reply(struct imx_dsp_ipc *ipc)
> >> +{
> >> +	unsigned long flags;
> >> +	struct snd_sof_dev *sdev = imx_dsp_get_data(ipc);
> >> +
> >> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&sdev->ipc_lock, flags);
> >> +	snd_sof_ipc_process_reply(sdev, 0);
> >> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sdev->ipc_lock, flags);
> > Are you sure have to use spin_lock?

> not sure, this definition was taken from previous drivers. I'd say keep it for now
> as removing it would require some more testing which will take some time.

If it's just factoring out common code it does make sense to do the
factoring out then incrementally change the locking as a separate change.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature