Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

[Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/16/2024 2:23 AM, LEROY Christophe wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 15/11/2024 à 22:26, Easwar Hariharan a écrit :
>> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de eahariha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>
>> This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce
>> secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.[1] In the review for
>> that series, Anna-Maria requested converting other users with
>> Coccinelle. This is part 1 that converts users of msecs_to_jiffies()
>> that use the multiply pattern of either of:
>> - msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000), or
>> - msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC)
> 
> After applying this series on top of tip/timers/core tree, I still find
> a lot of candidates to the conversion:
> 

Thanks for looking, that pattern of seconds-denominated
msecs_to_jiffies() calls will be addressed in a later part. As mentioned
in my reply to Anna-Maria[1], I'm not super-familiar with Coccinelle. I
sent this out as part 1 as mentioned in the cover letter above to make
incremental progress as much as I could. Julia has sent me a message
with a rule that could possibly address the pattern you point out.

I also see there are some instances in the grep results that appear to
be expression * 1000 rather than constant * 1000. I'll address those in
one of the later parts as well.

Thanks,
Easwar