Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

[Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/15/2024 1:29 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> On 11/15/2024 1:26 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce
>> secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.[1] In the review for
>> that series, Anna-Maria requested converting other users with
>> Coccinelle. This is part 1 that converts users of msecs_to_jiffies()
>> that use the multiply pattern of either of:
>> - msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000), or
>> - msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC)
>>
>> The entire conversion is made with Coccinelle in the script added in
>> patch 2. Some changes suggested by Coccinelle have been deferred to
>> later parts that will address other possible variant patterns.
>>
>> CC: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241030-open-coded-timeouts-v3-0-9ba123facf88@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/8734kngfni.fsf@somnus/
>>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - EDITME: describe what is new in this series revision.
>> - EDITME: use bulletpoints and terse descriptions.
>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115-converge-secs-to-jiffies-v1-0-19aadc34941b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
> 
> Apologies, I missed out on editing the changelog here. v1 included a
> patch that's already been accepted, there are no other changes in v2.
> 
> Thanks,
> Easwar

How do you expect this series to land since it overlaps a large number of
maintainer trees? Do you have a maintainer who has volunteered to take the
series and the maintainers should just ack? Or do you want the maintainers to
take the individual patches that are applicable to them?

/jeff