Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 11/7/24 2:25 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> If we really want to separate the mechanics of kernel development from
>> the associated process information - not always an easy separation, IMO
>> - we could make a top-level "development" directory, put a lot of the
>> other relevant stuff there, and include the debugging stuff. It seems
>> really weird to put debugging by itself, though; it's only part of the
>> picture.
>
> I could go with that.
>
>>
>> Why is Documentation/process so bad?
>
> Documentation/process/ is meta-documentation about kernel social "standards"
> among other things. It is "soft" documentation, whereas debugging (IMHO) is
> "hard" documentation.
>
> But hey, it's all your baby. Do whatever pleases you. :)
Hopefully not all mine...:)
My suggestion is to put it under process for now just to not block
forward progress on this work. We can surely relocate it if we want to
make a proper development-processes top-level directory in the future.
Thanks,
jon
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]