Re: [PATCH] ASoC: stm: Prevent potential division by zero in stm32_sai_mclk_round_rate()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hi Luo,

On 11/6/24 02:46, Luo Yifan wrote:
This patch checks if div is less than or equal to zero (div <= 0). If
div is zero or negative, the function returns -EINVAL, ensuring the
division operation (*prate / div) is safe to perform.

Signed-off-by: Luo Yifan <luoyifan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c b/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c
index 7bc4a96b7..2570daa3e 100644
--- a/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c
+++ b/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c
@@ -378,8 +378,8 @@ static long stm32_sai_mclk_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
  	int div;
div = stm32_sai_get_clk_div(sai, *prate, rate);
-	if (div < 0)
-		return div;
+	if (div <= 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
mclk->freq = *prate / div;

Thanks for your patch. It looks fine, but I think that it has to
be extended.

In CR1 register, MCKDIV = 0 gives the same result as MCKDIV = 1.
But while MCKDIV = 0 is valid, for sure div = 0 is not valid.

I agree that that div = 0 has to be managed as an error
This could be rather handled in stm32_sai_get_clk_div() function itself,
by returning an error, if div is null.
This is relevant as we may also get an error on test "if (input_rate % div)". I suggest to add a specific test and error message to handle this case in stm32_sai_get_clk_div().
Something like:
if (!div)) {
	dev_err(&sai->pdev->dev, "Invalid null divider\n");
	return -EINVAL;
}

BRs
Olivier








[Index of Archives]     [Pulseaudio]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux