Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] wcd937x codec fixes

[Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 04:31:29AM +0100, Alexey Klimov wrote:
> This sent as RFC because of the following:
> 
> - regarding the LO switch patch. I've got info about that from two persons
> independently hence not sure what tags to put there and who should be
> the author. Please let me know if that needs to be corrected.

The tags are fine there.

Just as a general thing if two changes aren't directly related and don't
overlap at all it's usually better to send them separately to avoid
creating spurious dependencies which can slow down getting things
reviewed and merged.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature