Re: [PATCH v29 01/33] xhci: support setting interrupt moderation IMOD for secondary interrupters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 05:07:12PM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On 10/16/2024 11:40 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 02:28:43PM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> >> From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Allow creators of xHCI secondary interrupters to specify the interrupt
> >> moderation interval value in nanoseconds when creating the interrupter.
> >>
> >> If not sure what value to use then use the xhci driver default
> >> xhci->imod_interval
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240905143300.1959279-13-mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 8 +++++++-
> >>  drivers/usb/host/xhci.c     | 4 ++--
> >>  drivers/usb/host/xhci.h     | 5 ++++-
> >>  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > This is already in 6.12-rc1, which makes me confused as to what tree you
> > made this series against.
> 
> Sorry, I didn't fetch the latest changes from usb-next.

It wasn't even usb-next, it was 6.12-rc1, so I don't know what tree you
based this on :(

> In this case, should I rebase and resbumit?

As the series can't be applied as-is, probably.  But I think you might
want to collect some acks from the sound people and xhci developers, as
I can't do anything with this until they look at the changes.

thanks,

greg k-h




[Index of Archives]     [Pulseaudio]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux