> Changed the error handling in aw_dev_get_dsp_status to return -EPERM directly
> instead of setting it to a variable.
* How do you think about to choose an imperative wording for an improved change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.12-rc2#n94
* Would you like to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.12-rc2#n145
…
> ---
> V1 -> V2:
> - add a dot after the commit
> - modify commit info
Can it be that higher version numbers would be more appropriate according to
the evolving patch review?
Regards,
Markus
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]