On 01/10/2024 09:50, Macpaul Lin wrote:
>
>
> On 10/1/24 15:05, Macpaul Lin wrote:
>> On 10/1/24 14:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>> +description: |
>>>> + The communication between MT6358 and SoC is through Mediatek PMIC
>>>> wrapper.
>>>> + For more detail, please visit Mediatek PMIC wrapper documentation.
>>>> + Must be a child node of PMIC wrapper.
>>>> +
>>>> +properties:
>>>> + compatible:
>>>> + enum:
>>>> + - mediatek,mt6366-sound
>>>> + - mediatek,mt6358-sound
>>>> + const: mediatek,mt6358-sound
>>>
>>> This wasn't ever tested.
>>
>> Hum, I have indeed tested it with linux-next/master branch.
>> Ran dt_binding_check with dtschema trunk with this single file
>> but didn't get any warning or errors.
>> 'make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=mt6358.yaml'
>>
>> Could you please help to paste the error log for me?
>> If there are new errors, I need to check if there is any
>> environment issue.
>
> I've both tested both of the following format pass dt_binding_check.
> #1.
> properties:
> compatible:
> items:
> - enum:
> - mediatek,mt6366-sound
> - mediatek,mt6358-sound
> - const: mediatek,mt6358-sound
I don't understand what you wanted here. neither oneOf nor ietms make
any sense. Why "mediatek,mt6358-sound", "mediatek,mt6358-sound" is a
correct compatible?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]