On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 06:33:49PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > How do you think about a wording variant like the following? > The result from a call of the function “devm_kzalloc” was passed to > a subsequent function call without checking for a null pointer before > (according to a memory allocation failure). > Thus return directly after a failed devm_kzalloc() call. Feel free to ignore Markus, he has a long history of sending unhelpful review comments and continues to ignore repeated requests to stop.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fix possible NULL Pointer Dereference in 'asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe'
- From: Markus Elfring
- Re: Fix possible NULL Pointer Dereference in 'asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe'
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix possible NULL Pointer Dereference in 'asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe'
- Next by Date: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: tas5805m: Adjustments for tas5805m_i2c_probe()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix possible NULL Pointer Dereference in 'asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe'
- Next by thread: Re: Fix possible NULL Pointer Dereference in 'asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe'
- Index(es):