On Wed Sep 25, 2024 at 9:53 AM BST, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 11:27:54AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 05:38:22AM GMT, Alexey Klimov wrote:
>
> > > +#define CDC_RX_RXn_RX_PATH_SEC7(rx, n) \
> > > + (0x0434 + rx->rxn_reg_stride * n + n * (n - 1) * rx->rxn_reg_stride2)
>
> > This is a nice hack to rule out n=0 and n=1, but maybe we can be more
> > obvious here:
>
> > (0x0434 + stride * n + (n > 2) ? stride2 : 0)
>
> Yes. We could also use some brackets to make the + and * precedence
> obvious.
Yeah, sure. If this approach with stride2 works then I can update to:
(0x0434 + (rx->rxn_reg_stride * n) + ((n > 1) ? rx->rxn_reg_stride2 : 0))
and update stride2 to 0xc.
Looks like I can also remove:
if (j == INTERP_AUX)
dsm_reg = CDC_RX_RXn_RX_PATH_DSM_CTL(rx, 2);
from rx_macro_digital_mute() since INTERP_AUX = 2 and this if-check was there
to handle special offset of DSM_CTL for RX2. If RXn() will generate correct
addresses then this no longer needed. Or such kind of clean-up should go
into separate patch.
BR,
Alexey
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]