Re: [PATCH 01/13] ALSA: pcm: add more sample rate definitions

[Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed 11 Sep 2024 at 12:51, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:33:01 +0200,
> Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> 
>> On 11/09/2024 12:21, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> >> Wondering if this is backwards compatible with the alsa-lib definitions,
>> >> specifically the topology parts which did unfortunately have a list of
>> >> rates that will map to a different index now:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> typedef enum _snd_pcm_rates {
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_UNKNOWN = -1,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_5512 = 0,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_8000,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_11025,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_16000,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_22050,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_32000,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_44100,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_48000,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_64000,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_88200,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_96000,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_176400,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_192000,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_CONTINUOUS = 30,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_KNOT = 31,
>> >> 	SND_PCM_RATE_LAST = SND_PCM_RATE_KNOT,
>> >> } snd_pcm_rates_t;
>> > 
>> > As far as I understand correctly, those rate bits used for topology
>> > are independent from the bits used for PCM core, although it used to
>> > be the same.  Maybe better to rename (such as SND_TPLG_RATE_*) so that
>> > it's clearer only for topology stuff.
>> 
>> Even if we rename these in alsa-lib we will need translation from
>> SND_TPLG_RATE_ to SND_PCM_RATE_ in kernel likely?
>> 
>> The topology files are out there and this is an ABI...
>> 
>> > But it'd be better if anyone can double-check.
>> 
>> Since the kernel just copies the rates bitfield, any rate above 11025
>> will be misaligned and result broken setup.
>
> Yep, I noticed it now, too.
>
> Below is the fix patch, totally untested.
> It'd be appreciated if anyone can test it quickly.
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
>
> -- 8< --
> From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] ALSA: pcm: Fix breakage of PCM rates used for topology
>
> It turned out that the topology ABI takes the standard PCM rate bits
> as is, and it means that the recent change of the PCM rate bits would
> lead to the inconsistent rate values used for topology.
>
> This patch reverts the original PCM rate bit definitions while adding
> the new rates to the extended bits instead.  This needed the change of
> snd_pcm_known_rates, too.  And this also required to fix the handling
> in snd_pcm_hw_limit_rates() that blindly assumed that the list is
> sorted while it became unsorted now.
>
> Fixes: 090624b7dc83 ("ALSA: pcm: add more sample rate definitions")
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/sound/pcm.h     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  sound/core/pcm_misc.c   | 18 ++++++++++--------
>  sound/core/pcm_native.c | 10 +++++++---
>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/sound/pcm.h b/include/sound/pcm.h
> index c993350975a9..824216799070 100644
> --- a/include/sound/pcm.h
> +++ b/include/sound/pcm.h
> @@ -109,23 +109,24 @@ struct snd_pcm_ops {
>  #define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_5512		(1U<<0)		/* 5512Hz */
>  #define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000		(1U<<1)		/* 8000Hz */
>  #define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_11025		(1U<<2)		/* 11025Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_12000		(1U<<3)		/* 12000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_16000		(1U<<4)		/* 16000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_22050		(1U<<5)		/* 22050Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_24000		(1U<<6)		/* 24000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_32000		(1U<<7)		/* 32000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_44100		(1U<<8)		/* 44100Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000		(1U<<9)		/* 48000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_64000		(1U<<10)	/* 64000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_88200		(1U<<11)	/* 88200Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_96000		(1U<<12)	/* 96000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_128000		(1U<<13)	/* 128000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_176400		(1U<<14)	/* 176400Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_192000		(1U<<15)	/* 192000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_352800		(1U<<16)	/* 352800Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_384000		(1U<<17)	/* 384000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_705600		(1U<<18)	/* 705600Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_768000		(1U<<19)	/* 768000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_16000		(1U<<3)		/* 16000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_22050		(1U<<4)		/* 22050Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_32000		(1U<<5)		/* 32000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_44100		(1U<<6)		/* 44100Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000		(1U<<7)		/* 48000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_64000		(1U<<8)		/* 64000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_88200		(1U<<9)		/* 88200Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_96000		(1U<<10)	/* 96000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_176400		(1U<<11)	/* 176400Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_192000		(1U<<12)	/* 192000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_352800		(1U<<13)	/* 352800Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_384000		(1U<<14)	/* 384000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_705600		(1U<<15)	/* 705600Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_768000		(1U<<16)	/* 768000Hz */
> +/* extended rates */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_12000		(1U<<17)	/* 12000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_24000		(1U<<18)	/* 24000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_128000		(1U<<19)	/* 128000Hz */
>  
>  #define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_CONTINUOUS	(1U<<30)	/* continuous range */
>  #define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT		(1U<<31)	/* supports more non-continuous rates */
> diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_misc.c b/sound/core/pcm_misc.c
> index 5588b6a1ee8b..4f556211bb56 100644
> --- a/sound/core/pcm_misc.c
> +++ b/sound/core/pcm_misc.c
> @@ -494,18 +494,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_pcm_format_set_silence);
>  int snd_pcm_hw_limit_rates(struct snd_pcm_hardware *hw)
>  {
>  	int i;
> +	unsigned int rmin, rmax;
> +
> +	rmin = UINT_MAX;
> +	rmax = 0;
>  	for (i = 0; i < (int)snd_pcm_known_rates.count; i++) {
>  		if (hw->rates & (1 << i)) {
> -			hw->rate_min = snd_pcm_known_rates.list[i];
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> -	for (i = (int)snd_pcm_known_rates.count - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> -		if (hw->rates & (1 << i)) {
> -			hw->rate_max = snd_pcm_known_rates.list[i];
> -			break;
> +			rmin = min(rmin, snd_pcm_known_rates.list[i]);
> +			rmax = max(rmax, snd_pcm_known_rates.list[i]);
>  		}
>  	}
> +	if (rmin > rmax)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	hw->rate_min = rmin;
> +	hw->rate_max = rmax;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_pcm_hw_limit_rates);
> diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_native.c b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
> index 7461a727615c..5e1e6006707b 100644
> --- a/sound/core/pcm_native.c
> +++ b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
> @@ -2418,13 +2418,17 @@ static int snd_pcm_hw_rule_sample_bits(struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
>  	return snd_interval_refine(hw_param_interval(params, rule->var), &t);
>  }
>  
> -#if SNDRV_PCM_RATE_5512 != 1 << 0 || SNDRV_PCM_RATE_768000 != 1 << 19
> +#if SNDRV_PCM_RATE_5512 != 1 << 0 || SNDRV_PCM_RATE_192000 != 1 << 12 ||\
> +	SNDRV_PCM_RATE_128000 != 1 << 19
>  #error "Change this table"
>  #endif
>  
> +/* NOTE: the list is unsorted! */
>  static const unsigned int rates[] = {
> -	5512, 8000, 11025, 12000, 16000, 22050, 24000, 32000, 44100, 48000, 64000,
> -	88200, 96000, 128000, 176400, 192000, 352800, 384000, 705600, 768000,
> +	5512, 8000, 11025, 16000, 22050, 32000, 44100,
> +	48000, 64000, 88200, 96000, 176400, 192000, 352800, 384000, 705600, 768000,
> +	/* extended */
> +	12000, 24000, 128000
>  };
>  
>  const struct snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list snd_pcm_known_rates = {

I've quickly tested this version with a few rates (48, 128, 768k),
amlogic device.

Looks Ok.

Tested-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Can't say for topology.

-- 
Jerome