FW: [PATCH v2 2/3] ASoC: dt-bindings: irondevice,sma1307: Add initial DT binding

[Ki-Seok Jo <kiseok.jo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> >
> > I have no intention of opposing the content. I am asking again because I
> didn't receive any warnings when I did the following, and I suspect I might
> have done something wrong.
> >
> >
> > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/irondevice,sma1307.yaml
> >
> > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 54 lines checked
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/irondevice,sma1307.yaml has no
> obvious style problems and is ready for submission.
> >
> > I was under the impression that this only applied to patched files as
> described above. It turns out it can also be used with patch files. Thank you
> for the useful information!
> >
> 
> That's not how you run checkpatch. You run it on the patch. Please read
> submitting-patches document. It explains everything.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


Hi,

I am in the process of carefully incorporating your feedback and making the necessary revisions.

May I kindly ask you a question, if it's not too much trouble?
When running checkpatch, what would be the best way to address the following warning?

WARNING: Prefer a maximum 75 chars per line (possible unwrapped commit description?)
#21:
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/irondevice,sma1307.yaml

In this case, would it be better for me to add a line break in the patch file, or should I leave it as is?


WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#65:
new file mode 100644

If the warning is appearing because it's a new file, is it something that can be safely ignored, or should I make changes to the MAINTAINERS file?

Thank you for your feedback. I am learning a lot of new things!

Best regards,
Kiseok Jo