[PATCH] ALSA: timer: Relax start tick time check for slave timer elements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



The recent addition of a sanity check for a too low start tick time
seems breaking some applications that uses aloop with a certain slave
timer setup.  They may have the initial resolution 0, hence it's
treated as if it were a too low value.

Relax and skip the check for the slave timer instance for addressing
the regression.

Fixes: 4a63bd179fa8 ("ALSA: timer: Set lower bound of start tick time")
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/6294
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
---
 sound/core/timer.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/core/timer.c b/sound/core/timer.c
index d104adc75a8b..71a07c1662f5 100644
--- a/sound/core/timer.c
+++ b/sound/core/timer.c
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ static int snd_timer_start1(struct snd_timer_instance *timeri,
 	/* check the actual time for the start tick;
 	 * bail out as error if it's way too low (< 100us)
 	 */
-	if (start) {
+	if (start && !(timer->hw.flags & SNDRV_TIMER_HW_SLAVE)) {
 		if ((u64)snd_timer_hw_resolution(timer) * ticks < 100000)
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
-- 
2.43.0





[Index of Archives]     [Pulseaudio]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux