Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs42l43: Move shutter IRQ handling into a worker thread

[Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 11:47:48PM +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> On 30. 07. 24 16:44, Mark Brown wrote:

> > With some of these slower buses it's not immediately obvious that it's
> > worth the bother of caching - the overhead of doing the lookup is
> > negligable in the overall context of handling the interrupt.

> I don't buy that argument. We should always try to write an optimal code.
> Every CPU tick counts.

So do the bytes of memory you'd use caching the pointers!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature