Re: [PATCH v10 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion

[Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 3:21 AM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 11:29:44AM +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-06-18 at 19:20 +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> > > Hello Andy!
> > > On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 12:58 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:38 AM Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay
> > > > <devnull+nikita.shubin.maquefel.me@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The goal is to recieve ACKs for all patches in series to merge it
> > > > > via Arnd branch.
> > > >
> > > > 'receive'
> > > >
> > > > > Unfortunately, CLK subsystem suddenly went silent on clk portion
> > > > > of
> > > > > series V2 reroll,
> > > > > tried to ping them for about a month but no luck.
> > > > >
> > > > > Link:
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240408-ep93xx-clk-v2-1-adcd68c13753@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > > > Some changes since last version (v9) - see "Changes in v10",
> > > > > mostly
> > > > > cosmetic.
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > > Patches should be formated with '--histogram'
> > > >
> > > > 'formatted'
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > > Changes in v10:
> > > > >
> > > > > Reordered SoB tags to make sure they appear before Rb and Acked
> > > > > tags.
> > > >
> > > > This is not required. The importance is only the order of SoBs
> > > > themselves. If they are interleaved with other tags, it's fine.
> > >
> > > Ah - ok. Just saw someone was complaining about b4 reordering them.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hopefully to see this series being eventually applied soon.
> > > > Arnd? (Do we have all necessary subsystem maintainers' tags, btw?)
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > As i see from my perspective only three left:
> > >
> > > Clk subsystem:
> > >
> > > - clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx
> > >
> > > DMA subsystem (but the only request from Vinod, as far as i remember,
> > > was fixing commits titles):
> > >
> > > - dmaengine: cirrus: Convert to DT for Cirrus EP93xx
> > > - dmaengine: cirrus: remove platform code
> > >
> > > Beside that tags missing on platform code removal (which can be Acked
> > > by Arnd himself i believe) and dtsi/dts files (same ?).
> >
> > Vinod acked the above two patches:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZnkIp8bOcZK3yVKP@matsya/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZnkImp8BtTdxl7O3@matsya/
> >
> > so only:
> >
> > - clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240617-ep93xx-v10-3-662e640ed811@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > left.
> >
> > Hope Stephen will find some time for this one.
>
> As we're approaching the merge window and this is still unclear, I
> applied the pwm bits (i.e. patches 12, 13). If I understand correctly,
> patch 33 isn't suitable for application yet as it has a dependency on
> pinctrl changes in that series.

Now causing an error in linux-next:

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/cirrus,ep9301-pwm.example.dts:18:18:
fatal error: dt-bindings/clock/cirrus,ep9301-syscon.h: No such file or
directory
   18 |         #include <dt-bindings/clock/cirrus,ep9301-syscon.h>
      |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:442:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/cirrus,ep9301-pwm.example.dtb]
Error 1