Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ASoC: codecs: lpass-rx-macro: Few code cleanups

[Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 01 Jul 2024 09:39:32 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Changes in v3:
> - New patch #1 to fix clang jump warning ("ASoC: codecs: lpass-rx-macro: Simplify PDS cleanup with devm")
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628-b4-qcom-audio-lpass-codec-cleanups-v2-0-e9741143e485@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Use cleanup.h instead of devm(), therefore not adding Dmitry's review.
> - New patch #5.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240627-b4-qcom-audio-lpass-codec-cleanups-v1-0-ede31891d238@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/6] ASoC: codecs: lpass-rx-macro: Simplify PDS cleanup with devm
      commit: 891168dc4a6c637ca76c64e7bde6917b96b9cd54
[2/6] ASoC: codecs: lpass-rx-macro: Simplify with cleanup.h
      commit: ee5e13b2c92324938c2bffc44b36b5a29fc28087
[3/6] ASoC: codecs: lpass-rx-macro: Keep static regmap_config as const
      commit: 0c02cacf62fd90bf9f0c6c33e9a4862cfc50aab4
[4/6] ASoC: dapm: Use unsigned for number of widgets in snd_soc_dapm_new_controls()
      commit: bf95919fe1917efa8f5da83057ff9fc11130aa55
[5/6] ASoC: codecs: lpass-rx-macro: Use unsigned for number of widgets
      commit: c72585d79249fb07ca3e3c91022e312d21f20f40
[6/6] ASoC: codecs: lpass-wsa-macro: Simplify with cleanup.h
      commit: 67820eb9f4895791da46df42ff7942dfc1353bb2

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark