On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:24:06AM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > Ah, ok. Sorry, I assumed you were objecting not just overloaded. There's a latency between me deciding to apply a patch and the patch actually ending up in my tree - I test everything which takes time.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- From: Simon Trimmer
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- From: Richard Fitzgerald
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- From: Richard Fitzgerald
- [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] ALSA: hda/realtek: Add quirk for Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AHP9
- Next by Date: Re: (subset) [PATCH 1/3] spi: cs42l43: Refactor accessing the SDCA extension properties
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
- Index(es):
 |