On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 12:45 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Changes for v2: > > - Added maintainers field > > - Dropped clock-names > > - Dropped unused unneded interrupts field > > Does the device has interrupts or not? This should justify decision, not > current usage by drivers. Yes the device has interrupts but feeding data FIFOs is handled by DMA (amba-pl08x.c). Should I declare interrupts despite they are not used in the compatible driver? -- Piotr Wojtaszczyk Timesys
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch v2 2/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpc32xx: Add lpc32xx i2s DT binding
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
- Re: [Patch v2 2/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpc32xx: Add lpc32xx i2s DT binding
- References:
- [Patch v2 1/2] ASoC: fsl: Add i2s and pcm drivers for LPC32xx CPUs
- From: Piotr Wojtaszczyk
- [Patch v2 2/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpc32xx: Add lpc32xx i2s DT binding
- From: Piotr Wojtaszczyk
- Re: [Patch v2 2/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpc32xx: Add lpc32xx i2s DT binding
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
- [Patch v2 1/2] ASoC: fsl: Add i2s and pcm drivers for LPC32xx CPUs
- Prev by Date: Re: [Patch v2 2/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpc32xx: Add lpc32xx i2s DT binding
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/6] auxbus: make to_auxiliary_drv accept and return a constant pointer
- Previous by thread: Re: [Patch v2 2/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpc32xx: Add lpc32xx i2s DT binding
- Next by thread: Re: [Patch v2 2/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpc32xx: Add lpc32xx i2s DT binding
- Index(es):