On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 06:59:31AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote: > On 6/4/2024 4:56 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Is anyone getting any value from these MODULE_DESCRIPTION()s? This all > > just seems like a huge amount of noise and I'm having trouble thinking > > of a use case. > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10770 Please include human readable descriptions of things like commits and issues being discussed in e-mail in your mails, this makes them much easier for humans to read especially when they have no internet access. I do frequently catch up on my mail on flights or while otherwise travelling so this is even more pressing for me than just being about making things a bit easier to read. and I'm not seeing anything in the above link that articulates an actual use case.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro
- From: Jeff Johnson
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro
- References:
- [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro
- From: Jeff Johnson
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro
- From: Jeff Johnson
- [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro
- Index(es):