On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 8:44 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think you are now mixing different things. changelog and differences > comparing to pure 1-to-1 conversion. Oh my apologies, the commit message being more descriptive? Should it also include the changelogs, or just a general description about mcpdm and it being used in omap4/omap5 platforms? -- Best Regards, Mithil
- References:
- [PATCH v6] ASoC: dt-bindings: omap-mcpdm: Convert to DT schema
- From: Mighty
- Re: [PATCH v6] ASoC: dt-bindings: omap-mcpdm: Convert to DT schema
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
- Re: [PATCH v6] ASoC: dt-bindings: omap-mcpdm: Convert to DT schema
- From: Mithil
- Re: [PATCH v6] ASoC: dt-bindings: omap-mcpdm: Convert to DT schema
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
- [PATCH v6] ASoC: dt-bindings: omap-mcpdm: Convert to DT schema
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v6] ASoC: dt-bindings: omap-mcpdm: Convert to DT schema
- Next by Date: [PATCH 0/3] Dead structs in sound/soc/codecs
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v6] ASoC: dt-bindings: omap-mcpdm: Convert to DT schema
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v6] ASoC: dt-bindings: omap-mcpdm: Convert to DT schema
- Index(es):
![]() |