On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 07:24:08PM +0000, James Ogletree wrote: > HI Mark, > > This file has not had any feedback yet for this version. For the sake of efficiency, I > would appreciate your feedback. That way I can make any needed changes > in the already-planned v11. Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled. Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context. This allows readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the discussion is being addressed.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [PATCH RESEND v10 0/5] Add support for CS40L50
- From: James Ogletree
- [PATCH RESEND v10 5/5] ASoC: cs40l50: Support I2S streaming to CS40L50
- From: James Ogletree
- Re: [PATCH RESEND v10 5/5] ASoC: cs40l50: Support I2S streaming to CS40L50
- From: James Ogletree
- [PATCH RESEND v10 0/5] Add support for CS40L50
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RESEND v10 5/5] ASoC: cs40l50: Support I2S streaming to CS40L50
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RESEND v10 5/5] ASoC: cs40l50: Support I2S streaming to CS40L50
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH RESEND v10 5/5] ASoC: cs40l50: Support I2S streaming to CS40L50
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH RESEND v10 5/5] ASoC: cs40l50: Support I2S streaming to CS40L50
- Index(es):