On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 02:57:02PM +0300, Péter Ujfalusi wrote: > On 29/05/2024 14:48, Mark Brown wrote: > > Sorry, it's already been applied and published with more stuff in CI now > > based on it. > Right, I don't see it in for-next, for-6.10 or for-linus. This patch > should be sent for 6.10 and I can prepare and send the rest (4 more > patches) to close the remaining holes regarding to NHLT blob selection > logic. If something is a bug fix it shouldn't have a subject saying "Add support", that is very obvioulsy a new feature. Have these systems ever worked?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Add support for NHLT with 16-bit only DMIC blob
- From: Peter Ujfalusi
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Add support for NHLT with 16-bit only DMIC blob
- From: Péter Ujfalusi
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Add support for NHLT with 16-bit only DMIC blob
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Add support for NHLT with 16-bit only DMIC blob
- From: Péter Ujfalusi
- [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Add support for NHLT with 16-bit only DMIC blob
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 6.10] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Fix input format query of process modules without base extension
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Add support for NHLT with 16-bit only DMIC blob
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Add support for NHLT with 16-bit only DMIC blob
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Add support for NHLT with 16-bit only DMIC blob
- Index(es):