Hi Dan
> > > 1201 struct device_node *ep0 = port_to_endpoint(port0);
> > > 1202 struct device_node *ep1 = port_to_endpoint(port1);
> > > 1203 struct device_node *codec0 = of_graph_get_remote_port(ep0);
> > > 1204 struct device_node *codec1 = of_graph_get_remote_port(ep1);
> > > 1205
> > > --> 1206 of_node_get(lnk);
> > >
> > > So this of_node_get() undoes the put. But if the reference count
> > > dropped to zero then this would be a use afer free.
> >
> > Thank you for pointing it.
> >
> > This "lnk" is used as "port0", and of_node_get(lnk) was for it,
> > but this function doesn't call of_node_put(port0).
> > So yes, indeed this of_node_get() is not needed.
> > Let's remove it.
>
> No no... of_get_next_child() will drop the reference. It is needed.
> The point is we should take the reference first before calling
> of_get_next_child().
>
> Maybe something like this:
>
> struct device_node *port1 = of_get_next_child(ports, of_node_get(lnk));
Oops, oh yes. It need to keep reference.
Thank you for your help, again. I will post fixup patch.
Best regards
---
Renesas Electronics
Ph.D. Kuninori Morimoto
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]