Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Define _GNU_SOURCE for sources using

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 5/9/24 00:13, Edward Liaw wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:10 PM Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 5/7/24 15:38, Edward Liaw wrote:
809216233555 ("selftests/harness: remove use of LINE_MAX") introduced
asprintf into kselftest_harness.h, which is a GNU extension and needs
_GNU_SOURCE to either be defined prior to including headers or with the
-D_GNU_SOURCE flag passed to the compiler.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20240430235057.1351993-1-edliaw@xxxxxxxxxx/
v2: add -D_GNU_SOURCE to KHDR_INCLUDES so that it is in a single
location.  Remove #define _GNU_SOURCE from source code to resolve
redefinition warnings.

Edward Liaw (5):
    selftests: Compile kselftest headers with -D_GNU_SOURCE
    selftests/sgx: Include KHDR_INCLUDES in Makefile

I appled patches 1/5 and 2.5 - The rest need to be split up.

    selftests: Include KHDR_INCLUDES in Makefile
    selftests: Drop define _GNU_SOURCE
    selftests: Drop duplicate -D_GNU_SOURCE


Please split these patches pwe test directory. Otherwise it will
cause merge conflicts which can be hard to resolve.

Hi Shuah,
Sean asked that I rebase the patches on linux-next, and I will need to
remove additional _GNU_SOURCE defines.  Should I send an unsplit v3 to
be reviewed, then split it afterwards?  I'm concerned that it will be
difficult to review with ~70 patches once split.

Please send them split - it will be easier to review and apply. You
might as well wait until the merge window is done. I don't think
anybody would have time to review now since merge window starts
next week.


thanks,
-- Shuah




[Index of Archives]     [Pulseaudio]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux