Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8192: fix register configuration for tdm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:31 PM Hsin-Te Yuan <yuanhsinte@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> For DSP_A, data is a BCK cycle behind LRCK trigger edge. For DSP_B, this
> delay doesn't exist. Fix the delay configuration to match the standard.
>
> Fixes: 52fcd65414abfc ("ASoC: mediatek: mt8192: support tdm in platform driver")
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Te Yuan <yuanhsinte@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-tdm.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-tdm.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-tdm.c
> index 9ce06821c7d0f..49440db370af0 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-tdm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-tdm.c
> @@ -566,10 +566,10 @@ static int mtk_dai_tdm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>                 tdm_con |= 1 << DELAY_DATA_SFT;
>                 tdm_con |= get_tdm_lrck_width(format) << LRCK_TDM_WIDTH_SFT;
>         } else if (tdm_priv->tdm_out_mode == TDM_OUT_DSP_A) {
> -               tdm_con |= 0 << DELAY_DATA_SFT;
> +               tdm_con |= 1 << DELAY_DATA_SFT;
>                 tdm_con |= 0 << LRCK_TDM_WIDTH_SFT;
>         } else if (tdm_priv->tdm_out_mode == TDM_OUT_DSP_B) {
> -               tdm_con |= 1 << DELAY_DATA_SFT;
> +               tdm_con |= 0 << DELAY_DATA_SFT;
>                 tdm_con |= 0 << LRCK_TDM_WIDTH_SFT;
>         }
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: 45db3ab70092637967967bfd8e6144017638563c
> change-id: 20240509-8192-tdm-cbf2a73c9dd3
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Hsin-Te Yuan <yuanhsinte@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>





[Index of Archives]     [Pulseaudio]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux