On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 11:25:13AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Andy,
>
> On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:02:50PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 10:47 AM Uwe Kleine-König
> > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > These drivers don't use the driver_data member of struct i2c_device_id,
> > > so don't explicitly initialize this member.
> > >
> > > This prepares putting driver_data in an anonymous union which requires
> > > either no initialization or named designators. But it's also a nice
> > > cleanup on its own.
> >
> > There are some drivers that have other (than I²C) ID tables, which
> > follow the same format. Can you also do the same with them for the
> > sake of consistency?
>
> I'm aware of these and plan to address them in a separate quest once I'm
> done with the i2c bits.
With this being promised, FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]