On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:37:10 +0200,
Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>
> patches 1, 3 & 5 fix the regression(s), patch 4 fixes a related pre-existing
> problem, patch 6 is a speculative fix on top of patch 4, and patch 2 is
> logically part of patch 3, just factored out for legibility.
>
> i don't think it really makes sense to revert fbb64eedf5a3 (ALSA: emu10k1: make
> E-MU dock monitoring interrupt-driven) and re-do things from scratch, as we'd
> also need to revert the unrelated c960b012ec47 (ALSA: emu10k1: track loss of
> external clock on E-MU cards) first.
>
> so i'd just fast-track the series as-is, and cherry-pick it to stable.
>
> ---
>
> the series (and a bunch of failed experiments) is fully tested by pietro with
> both rev1 and rev2 1010 cards, a 0202 cardbus card, and their respective docks.
> he'll get permanent testing credits in the card capability table later on, so i
> didn't bother adding a tested-by footer to each patch.
>
> ---
> v2:
> - split off non-bugfix part of the series
> - add quotes around summaries in Fixes footers
Applied to for-linus branch. Thanks.
Takashi
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]