Re: [PATCH RESEND v10 5/5] ASoC: cs40l50: Support I2S streaming to CS40L50

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, James Ogletree wrote:

> Hi Lee,
> 
> > On Apr 17, 2024, at 8:14 AM, Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, James Ogletree wrote:
> > 
> >>> On Apr 16, 2024, at 7:35 AM, Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> On Fri, 12 Apr 2024, James Ogletree wrote:
> >>>> All feedback to date has been addressed
> >>> 
> >>> There are still MFD review comments left outstanding.
> >> 
> >> Hi Lee,
> >> 
> >> As best as I can tell, the only review comment in v10 is from you,
> >> saying that the MFD part looks okay. Then in this resent series, you
> >> commented that the MFD part had not been updated. Indeed, this is
> >> because there were no comments to address. Please correct me if I
> >> interpreted your comment incorrectly.
> >> 
> >> I have also gone back over v8 and v9 looking for outstanding
> >> comments, and all of the review comments appear to be applied.
> >> Would you kindly link me to the email with the missing review
> >> comments if I am mistaken?
> > 
> > At the very least, you still have this in here:
> > 
> >    /* If write never occurred, don't bother polling for ACK */
> > 
> > After realising that I'd commented on this before, I stopped the
> > re-review.
> 
> It looks like I took some liberties here without communicating them,
> so my sincere apologies.
> 
> In V8 the line was:
> 
> "If we never wrote, don't bother checking for ACK”
> 
> In that review, you provided an improved phrasing:
> 
> "If the write never took place, no need to check for the ACK”
> 
> My takeaway from your phrasing was that the use of the first-person
> pronoun “we" was improper. So I rewrote it in the third-person, but
> still in my own words, resulting in its current form:
> 
> "If write never occurred, don't bother polling for ACK”
> 
> Is it that the phrase “don’t bother” is too idiomatic? If so I will apply
> your phrasing verbatim in V11.

Yes, it's a pretty bothersome phrase. :)

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]




[Index of Archives]     [Pulseaudio]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux