RE: 回复: [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: cdns: Add drivers of Cadence Multi-Channel I2S Controller

[Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 16/04/2024 21:51, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/16/24 02:23, Xingyu Wu wrote:
> > On 02/04/2024 21:57, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>> +#define PERIODS_MIN		2
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +static unsigned int cdns_i2s_pcm_tx(struct cdns_i2s_dev *dev,
> >>>>> +				    struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime,
> >>>>> +				    unsigned int tx_ptr, bool
> *period_elapsed,
> >>>>> +				    snd_pcm_format_t format)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> +	unsigned int period_pos = tx_ptr % runtime->period_size;
> >>>>
> >>>> not following what the modulo is for, usually it's modulo the buffer size?
> >>>
> >>> This is to see if the new data is divisible by period_size and to
> >>> determine whether it is enough for a period_size in the later loop.
> >>
> >> That didn't answer to my question, the position is usually between
> >> 0..buffer_size.1.
> >
> > Yes, this position will be used later in the cdns_i2s_pcm_pointer().
> > But this cdns_i2s_pcm_tx() is called by I2S hardware interrupt which
> > would be frequently called several times each period. The period_pos
> > is used to determine whether there is enough a period_size to call
> > snd_pcm_period_elapsed().
> >
> >>
> >> Doing increments on a modulo value then comparisons as done below
> >> seems rather questionable.
> >>
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +		iowrite32(data[0], dev->base + CDNS_FIFO_MEM);
> >>>>> +		iowrite32(data[1], dev->base + CDNS_FIFO_MEM);
> >>>>> +		period_pos++;
> >>>>> +		if (++tx_ptr >= runtime->buffer_size)
> >>>>> +			tx_ptr = 0;
> >>>>> +	}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +	*period_elapsed = period_pos >= runtime->period_size;
> >>>>> +	return tx_ptr;
> >>>>> +}
> >>
> >>>>> +	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> >>>>> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(&pdev->dev))
> >>>>> +		cdns_i2s_runtime_suspend(&pdev->dev);
> >>>>
> >>>> that sequence looks suspicious.... Why would you suspend
> >>>> immediately during the probe? You're probably missing all the autosuspend
> stuff?
> >>>
> >>> Since I have enabled clocks before, and the device is in the suspend
> >>> state after pm_runtime_enable(), I need to disable clocks in
> >>> cdns_i2s_runtime_suspend() to match the suspend state.
> >>
> >> That is very odd on two counts
> >> a) if you haven't enabled the clocks, why do you need to disbale them?
> >> b) if you do a pm_runtime_enable(), then the branch if
> >> (pm_runtime_enabled) is always true.
> >>
> >
> > a) It must enable clocks first to read and write registers when I2S probe.
> > Then it is done to probe, the clocks are still enabled and the state
> > of pm is suspend. So it need to be disabled to match the state and
> > will resume and be enabled by ALSA.
> 
> I think you are missing a pm_runtime_set_active() to reconcile the pm state with
> the hardware state. The premise of pm_runtime is that on probe your device is
> active and later on it will suspend. Having pm_runtime_enabled with a
> suspended device without the framework involved to trigger the transition to
> suspend is asking for trouble.

Great, It is better to use pm_runtime_set_active(). I will modify it in next patch.

> 
> > b) Because CONFIG_PM would be disabled and pm_runtime_enabled() return
> > false , then it is no need to disable clock and I2S still can work.
> 
> Again you are trying to make things more complicated than they need to be.
> Don't try to actively manage and query states, let the framework do it for you.
> 
> Try to probe and bring the device to an active state. Then use
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(), use pm_runtime_enable and let autosuspend
> do the work for you. If pm_runtime is not enabled the suspend will not happen.
> 
> Also keep in mind that pm_runtime_enabled() will return false if the user mucks
> with the power state in sysfs, it's not only a case of CONFIG_PM being selected
> or not.

Noted. Thanks.

> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "I2S supports %d stereo channels
> with %s.\n",
> >>>>> +		i2s->max_channels, ((i2s->irq < 0) ? "dma" : "interrupt"));
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +	return 0;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +err:
> >>>>> +	return ret;
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +static int cdns_i2s_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> >>>>> +	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> >>>>> +	if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&pdev->dev))
> >>>>> +		cdns_i2s_runtime_suspend(&pdev->dev);
> >>>>
> >>>> ... and this one too. Once you've disabled pm_runtime, checking the
> >>>> status is irrelevant...
> >>>
> >>> I think the clocks need to be always enabled after probe if disable
> >>> pm_runtime, and should be disabled when remove. This will do that.
> >>
> >> if you are disabling pm_runtime, then the pm_runtime state becames invalid.
> >> When pm_runtime_disable() is added in remove operations, it's mainly
> >> to prevent the device from suspending.
> >
> > Should I use the pm_runtime_enabled() before the pm_runtime_disable()?
> 
> It doesn't matter, the problem is the second part where you try to check the
> status of pm_runtime *after* disabling it.
> 

Will fix.

Thanks,
Xingyu Wu