On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 07:56:15AM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Extend the first paragraph to mention the {,num_}dapm_routes fields just
> like the widget conterparts. Mention the route fields also in the code
> example. Fix "at build time", this really means "at probe time".
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
LGTM, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [PATCH 00/12] ASoC: doc: dapm: various improvements
- From: Luca Ceresoli
- [PATCH 09/12] ASoC: doc: dapm: fix and improve section "Registering DAPM controls"
- From: Luca Ceresoli
- [PATCH 00/12] ASoC: doc: dapm: various improvements
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 08/12] ASoC: doc: dapm: describe how widgets and routes are registered
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 10/12] ASoC: doc: dapm: improve section "Codec/DSP Widget Interconnections"
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 09/12] ASoC: doc: dapm: fix and improve section "Registering DAPM controls"
- Next by thread: [PATCH 10/12] ASoC: doc: dapm: improve section "Codec/DSP Widget Interconnections"
- Index(es):
 |