On 27/03/2024 14:34, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 13:40 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> virtio core already sets the .owner, so driver does not need to.
>
>> All further patches depend on the first virtio patch, therefore please ack
>> and this should go via one tree: virtio?
>
> Sure. Though it's not really actually necessary, you can set it in the
> core and merge the other patches in the next cycle; those drivers that
> _have_ an .owner aren't broken after all.
>
> Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
True, this can be spread over two cycles. What I wanted to express, is
that maintainers should not pick individual patches.
Thanks for the Ack and apologies for a bit too big CC-list. I need to
learn how to ask b4 to make Cc-per-patch for such case.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]