Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,qcm6490: Add qcm6490 snd qcs6490 sound card

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 27/03/2024 12:32, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> Document bindings for the Qualcomm qcm6490 and qcs6490 SoC sound card.
> The bindings are the same as for other newer Qualcomm ADSP sound cards,
> thus keep them in existing qcom,sm8250.yaml file, even though Linux driver
> is separate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <quic_mohs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml
> index 2ab6871e89e5..247ad3d10933 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ properties:
>        - enum:
>            - qcom,apq8016-sbc-sndcard
>            - qcom,msm8916-qdsp6-sndcard
> +          - qcom,qcm6490-sndcard
> +          - qcom,qcs6490-sndcard

What are the differences between these sound cards? I know that we ask
for specific compatibles per each SoC block, but for similar SoCs sound
cards might be an exception. It's more of a software construct anyway.

Best regards,
Krzysztof