On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 07:00:39PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Okay, since the fix-patch had been applied, this one now is clean to go. > Do I need to resend or any other work needs to be done? Please resend. If I've told you a patch failed to build it's gone from my queue, I don't keep track of anything like that.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ASoC: soc-jack: Get rid of legacy GPIO support
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ASoC: soc-jack: Get rid of legacy GPIO support
- References:
- [PATCH v2 1/1] ASoC: soc-jack: Get rid of legacy GPIO support
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ASoC: soc-jack: Get rid of legacy GPIO support
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ASoC: soc-jack: Get rid of legacy GPIO support
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v2 1/1] ASoC: soc-jack: Get rid of legacy GPIO support
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ASoC: soc-jack: Get rid of legacy GPIO support
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ASoC: soc-jack: Get rid of legacy GPIO support
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ASoC: soc-jack: Get rid of legacy GPIO support
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ASoC: soc-jack: Get rid of legacy GPIO support
- Index(es):