On 3/17/24 19:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/03/2024 16:55, Jan Dakinevich wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/15/24 13:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 15/03/2024 00:21, Jan Dakinevich wrote:
>>>> This option allow to redefine the rate of DSP system clock.
>>>
>>> And why is it suitable for bindings? Describe the hardware, not what you
>>> want to do in the driver.
>>>
>>
>> What do you mean? I am adding some new property and should describe it
>> in dt-bindinds. Isn't it?
>
> No, if the property is not suitable for bindings, you should not add it
> in the first place. So again: explain what sort of hardware, not driver,
> problem you are solving here, so we can understand why do you need new
> property. Otherwise use existing properties or no properties, because we
> do not define all possible clocks in the bindings.
>
> Let's be clear: with such commit msg explanation as you have, my answer
> is: no, driver should set clock frequency and you do not need this
> property at all.
>
Could you please take a look on answer to "Jerome Brunet
<jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>"'s message on the same thread. There, I am trying
to explain what I am solving by this commit.
I would be happy to avoid this w/a, but currently this is the best I
came up with.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
--
Best regards
Jan Dakinevich
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]