On 19.02.2024 08:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/02/2024 07:25, claudiu beznea wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08.02.2024 18:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> None of the implementations of the get() and get_hw() callbacks of
>>> "struct of_clk_provider" modify the contents of received of_phandle_args
>>> pointer. They treat it as read-only variable used to find the clock to
>>> return. Make obvious that implementations are not supposed to modify
>>> the of_phandle_args, by making it a pointer to const.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c | 3 +-
>>> drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h | 3 +-
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> You understand there is no review for "part of patch"? You probably
> meant Acked-by.
Sure... Here it is:
Acked-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8-rc5/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L544
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]