Le 07/02/2024 à 16:10, Takashi Iwai a écrit :
Jean-Loïc Charroud wrote:
Fix device ID for "ASUS UM3402" and "ASUS UM6702RA/RC".
This change is only about the string in the table, not the actual
behavior, right?
Well, not sure it doesn't matter.
Before the device ID were swapped, my syslog reported :
cs35l41-hda i2c-CSC3551:00-cs35l41-hda.0: Error: ACPI _DSD
Properties are missing for HID CSC3551.
And then, after the patch 51d976079976c800ef19ed1b542602fcf63f0edb, it
reports :
cs35l41-hda i2c-CSC3551:00-cs35l41-hda.0: Failed property
cirrus,dev-index: -22
So, as it looks like a regression, it makes me think that the model name
may be checked along the device ID...
The name string there is only for debug info, so
it's no big problem even if it's not 100% right.
That is, this can be again split to another patch -- with the
additional Fixes tag to the commit that introduced the entries.
Add DSD values for "ASUS UM3402" to cs35l41_config_table[].
... and this one is the mandatory fix for your device. It should be
the patch 1. Then we'll have two more, one for correcting the entry
names, and another for sorting the entries.
I already submitted that last one
I'm a bit picky, but now you see how the things work.
Divide-and-conquer is the basic strategy.
Yes, but not smooth, as I have to workaround my broken mailer...
regards
Loïc
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]