On 06.02.24 16:35, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 04:05:15PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
>
>> The names in the datasheet are vdd for the 1V0 supply and vddio for the
>> 3V3 supply. I named the latter vdd2 instead because this device does not
>> have its own driver and instead it uses the onboard_usb_hub generic
>> driver, where the supplies are named vdd and vdd2.
>
>> Those are the names used for devm_regulator_bulk_get(). Is that not the
>> right way to match them?
>
> The binding should really use vddio instead of vdd2 but if that's an
> existing binding then it gets more annoying, probably that existing
> binding is wrong too since vddio does sound like an entirely plausible
> standard name for a 3.3V supply. :/ At the very least the binding
> should document the weird mapping, though ideally the driver would be
> tought to request names matching the datasheet if the compatible is the
> one for this device. Doing the better naming might be too much hassle
> though.
That is in line with my last reply, where the bindings I used as an
example mention the real names of the supplies as they are defined in
the datasheet.
I can add that for the next version.
Best regards,
Javier Carrasco
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]