Hi Sakari > > Thank you for your suggestion. > > But I'm not familiar with fwnode, and it seems we still need of_*, > > I will keep current style (= non fwnode) in v3 > > The fwnode API should be kept in sync with the OF (and other firmware > specific) API. Merging your set in its current form would leave fwnode API > impaired. Therefore I'd very much prefer to see this set add similar fwnode > APIs, too. I will keep current fwnode API behavior, but I can't test it. Now, I'm separating the patch-set into small stages. There is no problem for a while, but I think I will ask you to test it in the final stage. Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Renesas Electronics Ph.D. Kuninori Morimoto
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] of: property: add port base loop
- From: Laurent Pinchart
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] of: property: add port base loop
- References:
- [PATCH v2 00/13] of: property: add port base loop
- From: Kuninori Morimoto
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] of: property: add port base loop
- From: Laurent Pinchart
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] of: property: add port base loop
- From: Sakari Ailus
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] of: property: add port base loop
- From: Kuninori Morimoto
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] of: property: add port base loop
- From: Sakari Ailus
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] of: property: add port base loop
- From: Tomi Valkeinen
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] of: property: add port base loop
- From: Sakari Ailus
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] of: property: add port base loop
- From: Kuninori Morimoto
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] of: property: add port base loop
- From: Sakari Ailus
- [PATCH v2 00/13] of: property: add port base loop
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/27] sparc32: sunset sun4m and sun4d
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: core: fix unit test dependencies
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] of: property: add port base loop
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] of: property: add port base loop
- Index(es):