Re: [PATCH 1/3] ALSA: pcm: Add missing formats to formats list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 1/31/2024 6:41 PM, Ivan Orlov wrote:
On 1/26/24 09:01, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
On 1/25/2024 11:35 PM, Ivan Orlov wrote:
Add 4 missing formats to 'snd_pcm_format_names' array in order to be
able to get their names with 'snd_pcm_format_name' function.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  sound/core/pcm.c | 4 ++++
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/sound/core/pcm.c b/sound/core/pcm.c
index a09f0154e6a7..d0788126cbab 100644
--- a/sound/core/pcm.c
+++ b/sound/core/pcm.c
@@ -211,6 +211,10 @@ static const char * const snd_pcm_format_names[] = {
      FORMAT(DSD_U32_LE),
      FORMAT(DSD_U16_BE),
      FORMAT(DSD_U32_BE),
+    FORMAT(S20_LE),
+    FORMAT(S20_BE),
+    FORMAT(U20_LE),
+    FORMAT(U20_BE),
  };
  /**

Maybe we can also add some kind of static_assert to check at compile time that all formats are handled, something like: static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(snd_pcm_format_names) == SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_LAST + 1);

Although looking at definitions there is a hole between SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_U20_BE & SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_SPECIAL, which will cause this idea to fail.

Perhaps with comment:
static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(snd_pcm_format_names) == SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_LAST + 1 - 2); /* -2 for formats reserved for future use */
?

Hi Amadeusz,

Thank you for the review and sorry for the late answer. Yes, I believe it could be a nice improvement! Could I send a patch and specify you in Suggested-by tag?


Hi,

yes, go for it!

Amadeusz




[Index of Archives]     [Pulseaudio]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux