Hi Luca
Thank you for your review
> > To handle endpoint more intuitive, create of_graph_get_next_endpoint()
> >
> > of_graph_get_next_endpoint(port1, NULL); // A1
> > of_graph_get_next_endpoint(port1, A1); // A2
> > of_graph_get_next_endpoint(port1, A2); // NULL
>
> The idea looks good. My only concern is about reusing the
> of_graph_get_next_endpoint() name after having removed the old, different
> function having the same name. This can be confusing in the first
> place to who is used to the old function, and also to anybody rebasing
> their patches on top of a new kernel to find their code behaving
> differently.
>
> Also, as now we'd have two similar variants of this function, it would
> be good if each of them were having a name that clearly identifies in
> which way they differ from the other.
>
> So a better name for this function would probably be
> of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint() I guess, to clearly differentiate from
> of_graph_get_next_device_endpoint().
Yes, Indeed, Thank you for pointing it !
I will update it on v4
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Renesas Electronics
Ph.D. Kuninori Morimoto
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]