On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 06:29:12PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > Could you please try again, and tell me which patch fails to apply and > how it fails? It was the specific patch I replied to, just the standard "this patch doesn't apply" message.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: limit speaker volumes
- From: Johan Hovold
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: limit speaker volumes
- References:
- [PATCH v4 0/4] ASoC: qcom: volume fixes and codec cleanups
- From: Johan Hovold
- [PATCH v4 2/4] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: limit speaker volumes
- From: Johan Hovold
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: limit speaker volumes
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: limit speaker volumes
- From: Johan Hovold
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: limit speaker volumes
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: limit speaker volumes
- From: Johan Hovold
- [PATCH v4 0/4] ASoC: qcom: volume fixes and codec cleanups
- Prev by Date: [PATCH v2] treewide, serdev: change receive_buf() return type to size_t
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] pm: runtime: Simplify pm_runtime_get_if_active() usage
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: limit speaker volumes
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: limit speaker volumes
- Index(es):
 |