On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 07:06:31PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote: > Given that, that the rest of this series is under discussion (and esp. > whether > it is the correct way to do it) it might make sense to just revert the > picked > patches. The API change in the patch is a pain out of tree due to the way it's easy to add new things that miss the helpers without it so I'd rather keep it in if possible. The underlying implementation does need some TLC though.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [PATCH v11 00/10] spi: Add support for stacked/parallel memories
- From: Amit Kumar Mahapatra
- [PATCH v11 03/10] spi: Add multi-cs memories support in SPI core
- From: Amit Kumar Mahapatra
- Re: [PATCH v11 03/10] spi: Add multi-cs memories support in SPI core
- From: Guenter Roeck
- Re: [PATCH v11 03/10] spi: Add multi-cs memories support in SPI core
- From: Guenter Roeck
- Re: [PATCH v11 03/10] spi: Add multi-cs memories support in SPI core
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH v11 03/10] spi: Add multi-cs memories support in SPI core
- From: Guenter Roeck
- Re: [PATCH v11 03/10] spi: Add multi-cs memories support in SPI core
- From: Michael Walle
- [PATCH v11 00/10] spi: Add support for stacked/parallel memories
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v11 03/10] spi: Add multi-cs memories support in SPI core
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v11 03/10] spi: Add multi-cs memories support in SPI core
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v11 03/10] spi: Add multi-cs memories support in SPI core
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v11 03/10] spi: Add multi-cs memories support in SPI core
- Index(es):